Tensions Between Practice and Praxis in Academia: Adult Education, Neoliberalism, Professional Training, and Militarism
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.56105/cjsae.v26i2%20SI.3025Résumé
In education, there is a tension between exploring practice (focusing on the practicalities of an educator's daily work) and critical praxis (problematizing positionality as relates to pedagogies and engaging in a societal critique). I do not set this up as a duality, a dichotomy, or a continuum, but as a skewed Venn diagram, where there is a pull between foci as a result of educational paradigms and intersecting forces such as neoliberalism, corporatism, commodification of learning, and even militarism. These pressures have fueled an emphasis on practice and measurement, frequently at the expense of exploration and analysis, with particular implications for the field of adult education. In this article, I build on my own experiences as an advocate of adult education in an exploration of how education/learning is often framed in faculties of education and post-secondary institutions; the challenges and opportunities of merging adult education (and graduate and undergraduate courses) with other programs in faculties of education; and, the educational and societal implications of these framings and changes.
Références
Alexander, J. (2004). Control, alt, delete? Feminist pedagogy and the digital academy. In M. Reimer (Ed.), Inside corporate U: Women in the academy speak out (pp. 286-307). Toronto: Sumach Press.
Apple, M. W. (2006). What does it mean to be a public intellectual? The story of an intellectual "creep." Journal of Curriculum & Pedagogy, 3(1), 65-69.
Bill 92. Comprehensive public sector compensation freeze act. (2012). Legislative Assembly of Ontario.
Bill 115. Putting students first act. (2012). Legislative Assembly of Ontario.
Bondy, R. (2011). Women's studies: Is it time to change course? Herizons: Women's news + feminist views. Available from http://www.herizons.ca/node/439
Brock University. (2013a). Brock University to erect landmark sculpture. Available from
http://www.brocku.ca/brock-news/?p=22885
Brock University. (2013b). Spring convocation. Brock University.
Brule, E. (2004). Going to market: Neo-liberalism and the social construction of the university student as an autonomous consumer. In Reimer, M. (Ed.), Inside corporate U: Women in the academy speak out (pp. 247-264). Toronto: Sumach Press.
Burghardt, D.A., & Colbeck, C.L. (2005). Women’s Studies Faculty at the intersection of institutional power and feminist values. The Journal of Higher Education, 76(3), 301-330.
Butler, J. (1999) Gender trouble. New York: Routledge.
CAUT. (2013a). CAUT: Canadian Association of University Teachers. Available from
http://www.caut.ca/home.asp?page=432
CAUT. (2013b). Get science r!ght. Available from
http://getscienceright.ca/take-action/posters-and-campaign-material/
Daniel, J. (2012). Dual-mode universities in higher education: Way station or final destination? Open Learning, 27(1), 89-95.
Dobbie, D., & Robinson, I. (2008). Reorganizing higher education in the United States and Canada. Labour Studies Journal, 33(2), 117-140.
Enloe, C. (2000). Manoeuvers: The international politics of militarizing women's lives. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Enloe, C. (2007). Globalization & militarism: Feminists make the link. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.
Enloe, C. (2010). The risks of scholarly militarization: A feminist analysis. Perspectives on Politics, 8(4), 1107-1111.
Fournier, G., Loughridge, J., Macdonald, K.., Sperduti,V., Tsimicalis, E., & Taber, N. (2012). Learning to commemorate: Challenging prescribed collective memories of war. Social Alternatives, 31(2), 41-45.
Freire, P. (2000). Pedagogy of the oppressed: 30th anniversary edition. New York: Continuum.
Drummond, D. (2012). Commission on the reform of Ontario's public services. Queen's Printer for Ontario.
Giroux, H. (2009). Education and the crisis of youth: Schooling and the promise of democracy. Educational Forum, 73(1), 8-18.
Giroux, H. (2011). The politics of militarization and corporatization in higher education war colleges. CounterPunch, June 29, 2011. Available from http://www.counterpunch.org/2011/06/29/war-colleges/print
Herod, D. (2011, December 9). If I had a million dollars, I'd buy you a...monument? The Standard, pp. A1, A4.
HEQCO. (2013). Higher Education Quality Council of Ontario: An agency of the government of Ontario. Available from http://www.heqco.ca/en-CA/Pages/Home.aspx
Hobbs, M., & Rice, C. (2011). Rethinking women's studies: Curriculum, pedagogy, and the introductory course. Atlantis, 35(2), 139-149.
Hornosty, J. (2004). Corporate challenges to academic freedom and gender equity. In M. Reimer (Ed.), Inside corporate U: Women in the academy speak out (pp. 43-66). Toronto: Sumach Press.
Holloway, S., & Gouthro, P. (2011). Teaching resistance novice educators to be critically reflective. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 32(1), 29-41.
hooks, b. (1994). Teaching to transgress: Education as the practice of freedom. New York: Routledge.
Hyslop-Margison, E., & Leonard, H. (2012). Post neo-liberalism and the humanities: What the repressive state apparatus means for universities. Canadian Journal of Higher Education, 42(2), 1-12.
Kahnert, P. (2013, March 11). "Right to work" is a lie. Rabble.ca. Available from http://rabble.ca/news/2013/03/right-work-lie
Lightstone, J. (2013a). President's Report to Senate - May 2013. Office of the President.
Lightstone, J. (2013b, June 28). The need for a program review. Available from http://www.brocku.ca/president/program-review
Linnitt, C. (2013). Harper's attack on science: No science, no evidence, no truth, no democracy. Academic Matters: OCUFA's Journal of Higher Education, May 3-7.
Luxton, M., & Mossman, M. J. (2012). (Eds.). Reconsidering knowledge: Feminism and the academy. Halifax: Fernwood Publishing.
McKay, I., & Swift, J. (2012). Warrior nation: Rebranding Canada in an age of anxiety. Toronto: Between the Lines.
Nesbit, T. (2013). Canadian adult education: A critical tradition. In T. Nesbit, S. Brigham, N. Taber, & T. Gibb (Eds.), Building on critical traditions: Adult education and learning in Canada (pp. ix - xxiii). Toronto: Thompson Publishing.
Newson, J. (2012). The university-on-the-ground: Reflections on the Canadian experience. In M.
Luxton & M.J. Mossman (Eds.), Reconsidering knowledge: Feminism and the academy. Halifax: Fernwood Publishing.
Orwin, P. (2012, August 17). There's no online substitute for a real university. The Globe and Mail. Available from
Paechter, C. (2003). Masculinities and femininities as communities of practice. Women's Studies International Forum, 26(1), 69-77.
Paul, L. (2004). The untenured female academic in the corporate university. In M. Reimer (Ed.), Inside corporate U: Women in the academy speak out (pp. 226-244). Toronto: Sumach Press.
Plumb, D., & Welton, M. (2001). Theory building in adult education: Questioning our grasp of the obvious. In Poonwassie, D. H. & Poonwassie, A. (Eds.), Fundamentals of adult education: Foundations, practice, issues (pp. 63-75). Toronto: Thompson Educational Publishing Inc.
Reimer, M. (Ed.). (2004). Inside corporate U: Women in the academy speak out. Toronto: Sumach Press.
Ritzer, G. (2002). Enchanting McUniversity: Toward a spectacularly irrational university quotidian. In D. Hayes & R. Wynyard (Eds.), The McDonaldization of higher education (pp.19-32). Westport: Bergin & Garvey.
Robinson, K. (2001). Mind the gap: The creative conundrum. Critical Quarterly, 43(1), 41-45.
Rost, S. (2013, June 6). Brock unveils plan for $1M commemoration project. Niagara this week, 10(8), pp. 1-16.
Servage, L. (2009). The scholarship of teaching and learning and the neo-liberalization of higher education: Constructing the "entrepreneurial learner." Canadian Journal of Higher Education, 39(2), 25-44.
Simpson, J. S. (2010). I’m more afraid of the four of you than I am of the terrorists: Agency, dissent, and the challenges of democratic hope. Review of Education, Pedagogy, and Cultural Studies, 32(2), 177- 205.
Taber, N. (2009). Exploring the interconnections between adult education, militarism, and gender: Implications for our field. Studies in Continuing Education, 31(2), 189-196.
Taber, N. (2011). Critiquing war in the classroom: Problematizing the normalization of gendered militarism. Proceedings (S. Carpenter, S. Dossa, & B. Osborne. Eds.) of Canadian Association for Studies in Adult Education (CASAE)/Adult Education Research Conference (AERC), 2011 Joint Conference. Toronto: Ontario Institute for the Study of Education, University of Toronto.
Taber, N. (2011b). “You better not get pregnant while you’re here”: Tensions between masculinities and femininities in military communities of practice. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 30(3), 331-348.
Taber, N. (2013). Learning war through gender: Masculinities, femininities, and militarism. In T. Nesbit, S. Brigham, N. Taber, & T. Gibb. (Eds.), Building on critical traditions: Adult education and learning in Canada (pp. 139-148). Toronto: Thompson Publishing.
Taber, N. (in press). Generals, colonels, and captains: Discourses of militarism, higher education, and learning in the Canadian university context. Canadian Journal of Higher Education.
Thornton, M. (2012). Universities upside down: The impact of the new knowledge economy, In M. Luxton & M.J. Mossman (Eds.), Reconsidering knowledge: Feminism and the academy. (pp. 76-95). Halifax: Fernwood Publishing.
Webber, M. (2005). "Don't be so feminist": Exploring student resistance to feminist approaches in a Canadian university. Women's Studies International Forum, 28(2/3), 181-194.
Webber, M. (2006). Transgressive pedagogies? Exploring the difficult realities of enacting feminist pedagogies in undergraduate classrooms in a Canadian university. Studies in Higher Education, 31(4), 453-467.
Webber, M. (2008). Miss congeniality meets the new managerialism: Feminism, contingent labour, and the new university. Canadian Journal of Higher Education, 38(3), 37-56.
Welton, M. (2013). Adult education in Canada: Unearthing Canada’s hidden past. Toronto: Thompson Educational Publishers.
Téléchargements
Publié-e
Comment citer
Numéro
Rubrique
Licence
Les auteurs des manuscrits acceptés pour publication devront céder les droits à la Revue canadienne pour l’étude de l’éducation des adultes (RCÉÉA). La RCÉÉA demande que, en tant que créateur(s)/auteur(s) du manuscrit soumis, vous attribuiez certains droits au manuscrit à RCÉÉA en échange de l’engagement à publier l’article en version imprimée et sous forme électronique et que, en général, à poursuivre sa diffusion à travers le monde. Les droits demandés par RCÉÉA sont:
- Le droit de publier l’article en version imprimée et sous forme électronique ou sous toute autre forme qui est s’enligne avec son rôle de publication scientifique dans le but de diffuser les travaux sur une plus grande étendue;
- Le droit d’être le seul éditeur de l’article pour une période de 12 mois;
- Le droit de rendre l’article disponible au public à l’intérieur d’une période de 24 mois, tel que déterminé par le personnel pertinent de RCÉÉA;
- Le droit de s’attribuer des droits de reproduction ou d’accorder ce droit à d’autres sous forme imprimée, électronique ou toute autre forme, dans ce cas, les revenus accumulés à être partagés équitablement entre les auteurs et la revue;
- Le droit d’administrer la permission d’utiliser des portions de l’article tel que demandé par d’autres, cherchant la récompense lorsque jugé approprié par RCÉÉA;
- Le droit de rechercher ou de profiter de possibilités à voir l’article inclus dans une base de données visant à accroître sa notoriété;
- En tant qu’auteur, RCÉÉA désire que vous conserviez le droit de republier l’article, avec accusé de RCÉÉA en tant que premier éditeur, en tout ou en partie, dans tout autre de vos publications, y compris toute anthologie que vous pourriez éditer jusqu’à un total de trios autres;
- En tant qu’auteur, RCÉÉA désire que vous conserviez le droit de placer l’article sur votre page Web personnelle ou celle de votre université ou institution. RCÉÉA vous demande toutefois d’y afficher l’avis suivant: Une version pleinement éditée et examinée par les pairs de cet article a d’abord été publiée par Canadian Journal for the Study of Adult Education/la Revue canadienne pour l’étude de l’éducation des adultes, <Année>, <Volume>, <Numéro>, <Numéro de page>.
PAR L’ACCEPTATION DE CE QUI PRÉCÈDE, VOUS CONFIRMEZ QUE LE MANUSCRIT EN SOUMISSION N’A PAS ÉTÉ PUBLIÉ AILLEURS EN TOTALITÉ OU EN PARTIE, ET QU’AUCUN ACCORD DE PUBLICATION EST EN COURS D’ÉVALUATION.
SI L’ARTICLE CONTIENT DES ÉLÉMENTS REQUÉRANT UNE AUTORISATION ÉCRITE POUR INCLUSION, VOUS CONVENEZ QU’IL EST DE VOTRE DEVOIR PAR LA LOI D’IDENTIFIER CES ÉLÉMENTS À LA DIRECTION DE RCÉÉA ET D’OBTENIR CETTE AUTORISATION. RCÉÉA NE PAIERA PAS DE DROITS D’AUTORISATION. SI RCÉÉA EST D’AVIS QUE CETTE AUTORISATION EST NÉCESSAIRE, ELLE VOUS DEMANDERA D’OBTENIR CELLE-CI AVANT PUBLICATION.
EN TANT QU’AUTEUR(S), VOUS CERTIFIEZ QUE L’ARTICLE EN SOUMISSION VOUS EST ORIGINAL.
En autant que les conditions ci-dessus vous soient satisfaisantes et que vous y consentiez, veuillez indiquer votre accord en cochant la case appropriée et procéder à votre soumission.
Cet accord a été extrait avec la permission du « guide des meilleures pratiques pour l’édition des revues savantes » (2007), produit par l’Association canadienne des revues savantes (ACRS).
